PFAS in tap water, ZIP 13501 (Utica, Herkimer County and Oneida County)

No serving system had a quantified PFAS-4 compound above the 3 to 4 ng/L reporting limits at its latest sample. That's below the lab limit, not zero.

2 community water systems report serving ZIP 13501 (Utica, Herkimer County and Oneida County, New York) · 476,250 people served

Water systems serving ZIP 13501

Water system People served PFAS-4 at the latest sample Entry points Latest sample
Ocwa reported by the system to EPA 350,000 below the 3 to 4 ng/L reporting limit 3 December 18, 2023
Mvwa - Mohawk Valley Water Authority reported by the system to EPA 126,250 below the 3 to 4 ng/L reporting limit 1 October 7, 2025

Not sure which one is yours? The systems report their own ZIP lists to EPA. Check your water bill or your utility's Consumer Confidence Report.

Where this ZIP is

How to read these numbers

We compare PFAS-4 (PFOA + PFOS + PFNA + PFHxS) with this site's 0.5 ng/L benchmark, the same line as on the European pages. UCMR 5 reporting limits are 3 to 4 ng/L. So any quantified PFAS-4 compound is above the benchmark, and a clean result reads "below the 3 to 4 ng/L reporting limit", never zero. The US legal limit is the 4 ng/L federal MCL for PFOA and PFOS, which systems must meet from April 26, 2029 ("above the 2029 federal MCL").

EPA: "UCMR 5 results do not indicate compliance or noncompliance with the PFAS drinking water standards". Samples are taken where water enters the distribution system, not at your tap. A system may have changed sources or added treatment since. Source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Office of Water, PFAS National Primary Drinking Water Regulation (NPDWR). Regulation details retrieved September 19, 2026. Every system page tracks the 2029 compliance date and the proposed rescission of the PFHxS, PFNA, HFPO-DA and Hazard Index limits.

This site is a data project, not an official source. If in doubt, check with your water supplier or local authority.