PFAS in the drinking water of Nwwa Warrington Township: none of the four main PFAS detected, each below the 3 to 4 ng/L reporting limit

Last PFAS check: · Source: EPA UCMR 5

PFAS in drinking water

No PFAS detected

Amount found in the water PFAS-4: not detected each compound below the 3 to 4 ng/L reporting limit; together < 15 ng/L, the sum of the four reporting limits 25 PFAS looked for, none quantified
Our health benchmark 0.5 ng/L

UCMR 5 reports nothing below its 3 to 4 ng/L reporting limits, which sit above the 0.5 ng/L benchmark. Water above the benchmark but below the reporting limits would pass this test unnoticed.

0.5 ng/L is our benchmark, not an official limit. It uses the same EFSA method as the Swedish, Danish and Dutch limits, with stricter safety choices. It's meant as a yearly average. The comparison above uses the latest check.

checked on October 22, 2025

Sampled on October 22, 2025 at Entry Point 111 (NWWA LOWER NIKE). It has the newest complete sample of the system's 13 entry points. Samples are taken at the entry point to the distribution system, not at your tap.

More about this result

The lab detects each of the four substances from 3 to 4 ng/L upward. None reached that limit, so their total is below 15 ng/L rather than zero.

UCMR 5 measures 29 PFAS one by one and publishes no EU-style total; this page shows the PFAS-4 sum and each compound.

25 PFAS (see each substance)
PFAS substance Value
PFOA below the 4 ng/L reporting limit
PFOS below the 4 ng/L reporting limit
PFHxS below the 3 ng/L reporting limit
PFNA below the 4 ng/L reporting limit
HFPO-DA below the 5 ng/L reporting limit
PFBS below the 3 ng/L reporting limit
11Cl-PF3OUdS below the 5 ng/L reporting limit
4:2 FTS below the 3 ng/L reporting limit
6:2 FTS below the 5 ng/L reporting limit
8:2 FTS below the 5 ng/L reporting limit
9Cl-PF3ONS below the 2 ng/L reporting limit
ADONA below the 3 ng/L reporting limit
NFDHA below the 20 ng/L reporting limit
PFBA below the 5 ng/L reporting limit
PFDA below the 3 ng/L reporting limit
PFDoA below the 3 ng/L reporting limit
PFEESA below the 3 ng/L reporting limit
PFHpA below the 3 ng/L reporting limit
PFHpS below the 3 ng/L reporting limit
PFHxA below the 3 ng/L reporting limit
PFMBA below the 3 ng/L reporting limit
PFMPA below the 4 ng/L reporting limit
PFPeA below the 3 ng/L reporting limit
PFPeS below the 4 ng/L reporting limit
PFUnA below the 2 ng/L reporting limit

None found above the 3 to 4 ng/L reporting limits. Every compound is listed in the details below.

Federal MCL, PFOA and PFOS (each)
4.0 ng/L PFOA and PFOS not above it at the headline sample; applies from April 2029
Latest UCMR 5 sample
October 22, 2025 entry-point sample, not your tap
EPA system ID (PWSID)
PA1090070
Details and sources

At Nwwa Warrington Township (Pennsylvania), none of the four most closely watched PFAS (PFAS-4) was detected in the latest UCMR 5 entry-point sample on October 22, 2025 at Entry Point 111 (NWWA LOWER NIKE): each compound was below the 3 to 4 ng/L reporting limit. UCMR 5 reports nothing below those limits, so the test cannot say whether the water is above or below the 0.5 ng/L health benchmark used by pfasnearme. PFOA below the 4 ng/L reporting limit and PFOS below the 4 ng/L reporting limit, neither above the 4.0 ng/L federal MCL for PFOA and PFOS that systems must meet from April 2029. Across 40 UCMR 5 sampling events since January 15, 2025, no PFAS-4 compound was quantified at any entry point (each result below the 3 to 4 ng/L reporting limit). Source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule (UCMR 5) occurrence data, final dataset (August 2026), public domain.

EPA system ID (PWSID): PA1090070Population served: 21,588 Latest UCMR 5 sample: November 20, 2025 Data updated on

PFAS over time in Nwwa Warrington Township

40 UCMR 5 sampling events since January 15, 2025, as published by EPA. Samples come from 13 entry points; the trend refers to Entry Point 111 (NWWA LOWER NIKE).

DatePFAS-4Entry point
< 15 ng/LEntry Point 108 (NWWA STUMP RD)
< 15 ng/LEntry Point 109 (NWWA PICKERTOWN RD)
< 15 ng/LEntry Point 110 (NWWA BRADFORD GREENE)
< 15 ng/LEntry Point 111 (NWWA LOWER NIKE)
< 15 ng/LEntry Point 112 (NWWA WOODLANDS)
< 15 ng/LEntry Point 113 (NWWA HIGH GROVE)
< 15 ng/LEntry Point 114 (NWWA COUNTY LINE RD)
< 15 ng/LEntry Point 101 (WELLS 1,2,6 EP)
< 15 ng/LEntry Point 102 (WELL 3 EP)
< 15 ng/LEntry Point 104 (WELL 5 EP)
< 15 ng/LEntry Point 105 (WELL 8 EP)
< 15 ng/LEntry Point 106 (WELL 9 EP)
Show the 28 earlier checks (back to January 15, 2025)
< 15 ng/LEntry Point 107 (WELL 11 EP)
< 15 ng/LEntry Point 108 (NWWA STUMP RD)
< 15 ng/LEntry Point 109 (NWWA PICKERTOWN RD)
< 15 ng/LEntry Point 110 (NWWA BRADFORD GREENE)
< 15 ng/LEntry Point 111 (NWWA LOWER NIKE)
< 15 ng/LEntry Point 112 (NWWA WOODLANDS)
< 15 ng/LEntry Point 113 (NWWA HIGH GROVE)
< 15 ng/LEntry Point 114 (NWWA COUNTY LINE RD)
< 15 ng/LEntry Point 108 (NWWA STUMP RD)
< 15 ng/LEntry Point 109 (NWWA PICKERTOWN RD)
< 15 ng/LEntry Point 110 (NWWA BRADFORD GREENE)
< 15 ng/LEntry Point 111 (NWWA LOWER NIKE)
< 15 ng/LEntry Point 112 (NWWA WOODLANDS)
< 15 ng/LEntry Point 113 (NWWA HIGH GROVE)
< 15 ng/LEntry Point 114 (NWWA COUNTY LINE RD)
< 15 ng/LEntry Point 101 (WELLS 1,2,6 EP)
< 15 ng/LEntry Point 102 (WELL 3 EP)
< 15 ng/LEntry Point 104 (WELL 5 EP)
< 15 ng/LEntry Point 105 (WELL 8 EP)
< 15 ng/LEntry Point 106 (WELL 9 EP)
< 15 ng/LEntry Point 107 (WELL 11 EP)
< 15 ng/LEntry Point 108 (NWWA STUMP RD)
< 15 ng/LEntry Point 109 (NWWA PICKERTOWN RD)
< 15 ng/LEntry Point 110 (NWWA BRADFORD GREENE)
< 15 ng/LEntry Point 111 (NWWA LOWER NIKE)
< 15 ng/LEntry Point 112 (NWWA WOODLANDS)
< 15 ng/LEntry Point 113 (NWWA HIGH GROVE)
< 15 ng/LEntry Point 114 (NWWA COUNTY LINE RD)

A value preceded by "<" means no PFAS-4 compound was quantified, the figure being the sum of the four UCMR 5 reporting limits. Sums with a compound below the 3 to 4 ng/L reporting limit are lower bounds. How to read a PFAS result

Compliance status

UCMR 5 results do not indicate compliance or noncompliance with the PFAS drinking water standards. UCMR 5 is a national monitoring survey; the system's compliance record and its annual Consumer Confidence Report come from the state agency and EPA's SDWIS.

See all 14 test results
What was tested Value Limit Status
PFAS Hazard Index (US EPA) < 1.2 (index; nothing quantified) MCL (from April 2029): 1 not computable
PFAS-4 (PFOA + PFOS + PFNA + PFHxS) · Entry Point 101 (WELLS 1,2,6 EP) · maximum below the 15 ng/L reporting limit no MCL for the sum; MCL (from April 2029) 4.0 ng/L for PFOA and for PFOS not detected
PFAS-4 (PFOA + PFOS + PFNA + PFHxS) · Entry Point 102 (WELL 3 EP) · maximum below the 15 ng/L reporting limit no MCL for the sum; MCL (from April 2029) 4.0 ng/L for PFOA and for PFOS not detected
PFAS-4 (PFOA + PFOS + PFNA + PFHxS) · Entry Point 104 (WELL 5 EP) · maximum below the 15 ng/L reporting limit no MCL for the sum; MCL (from April 2029) 4.0 ng/L for PFOA and for PFOS not detected
PFAS-4 (PFOA + PFOS + PFNA + PFHxS) · Entry Point 105 (WELL 8 EP) · maximum below the 15 ng/L reporting limit no MCL for the sum; MCL (from April 2029) 4.0 ng/L for PFOA and for PFOS not detected
PFAS-4 (PFOA + PFOS + PFNA + PFHxS) · Entry Point 106 (WELL 9 EP) · maximum below the 15 ng/L reporting limit no MCL for the sum; MCL (from April 2029) 4.0 ng/L for PFOA and for PFOS not detected
PFAS-4 (PFOA + PFOS + PFNA + PFHxS) · Entry Point 107 (WELL 11 EP) · maximum below the 15 ng/L reporting limit no MCL for the sum; MCL (from April 2029) 4.0 ng/L for PFOA and for PFOS not detected
PFAS-4 (PFOA + PFOS + PFNA + PFHxS) · Entry Point 108 (NWWA STUMP RD) · maximum below the 15 ng/L reporting limit no MCL for the sum; MCL (from April 2029) 4.0 ng/L for PFOA and for PFOS not detected
PFAS-4 (PFOA + PFOS + PFNA + PFHxS) · Entry Point 109 (NWWA PICKERTOWN RD) · maximum below the 15 ng/L reporting limit no MCL for the sum; MCL (from April 2029) 4.0 ng/L for PFOA and for PFOS not detected
PFAS-4 (PFOA + PFOS + PFNA + PFHxS) · Entry Point 110 (NWWA BRADFORD GREENE) · maximum below the 15 ng/L reporting limit no MCL for the sum; MCL (from April 2029) 4.0 ng/L for PFOA and for PFOS not detected
PFAS-4 (PFOA + PFOS + PFNA + PFHxS) · Entry Point 112 (NWWA WOODLANDS) · maximum below the 15 ng/L reporting limit no MCL for the sum; MCL (from April 2029) 4.0 ng/L for PFOA and for PFOS not detected
PFAS-4 (PFOA + PFOS + PFNA + PFHxS) · Entry Point 113 (NWWA HIGH GROVE) · maximum below the 15 ng/L reporting limit no MCL for the sum; MCL (from April 2029) 4.0 ng/L for PFOA and for PFOS not detected
PFAS-4 (PFOA + PFOS + PFNA + PFHxS) · Entry Point 114 (NWWA COUNTY LINE RD) · maximum below the 15 ng/L reporting limit no MCL for the sum; MCL (from April 2029) 4.0 ng/L for PFOA and for PFOS not detected
Lithium · UCMR 5, for reference below the 9 µg/L reporting limit no MCL for reference

Frequently asked questions

Is the tap water in Nwwa Warrington Township safe to drink?

In the latest UCMR 5 entry-point sample on October 22, 2025, none of the four most closely watched PFAS was detected: each was below the 3 to 4 ng/L reporting limit. That is below the 4.0 ng/L federal MCL for PFOA and PFOS, but the test cannot tell whether the water is above or below the 0.5 ng/L benchmark pfasnearme uses. EPA set the maximum contaminant level goal (MCLG) for PFOA and PFOS at zero because there is no level without risk. UCMR 5 results do not indicate compliance or noncompliance with the PFAS drinking water standards, and this site reports published measurements without judging health risk. This is not medical advice. If you are concerned, talk to your water system or your doctor.

What is UCMR 5 and why do the results say "below the reporting limit"?

The Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule (UCMR 5) had every large US water system and a sample of small ones test 29 PFAS and lithium between 2023 and 2025, at each entry point to the distribution system. EPA set minimum reporting levels of 3 to 4 ng/L for PFOA, PFOS, PFNA and PFHxS and reports nothing below them. A result "below the 3 to 4 ng/L reporting limit" therefore means the lab could not quantify the compound, not that it is absent, and it is never shown here as zero.

What do the 0.5 ng/L benchmark and the 4.0 ng/L MCL mean, and why are both shown?

0.5 ng/L for the PFAS-4 sum (PFOA + PFOS + PFNA + PFHxS) is the health benchmark pfasnearme applies on every page, in Europe and the United States, built from the European Food Safety Authority's tolerable intake with stricter safety choices. 4.0 ng/L is the enforceable federal maximum contaminant level for PFOA and for PFOS individually under EPA's PFAS National Primary Drinking Water Regulation (NPDWR), the US legal limit. Any PFAS-4 compound quantified under UCMR 5 (at or above 3 to 4 ng/L) is above the benchmark, so the benchmark tells you whether anything was found and the MCL tells you whether the system would have to act. EPA set the maximum contaminant level goal (MCLG) for PFOA and PFOS at zero because there is no level without risk.

When does the 4.0 ng/L MCL apply, and could it change?

EPA published the PFAS National Primary Drinking Water Regulation (NPDWR) on April 26, 2024. Systems must finish initial monitoring by April 26, 2027, tell customers about PFAS in their 2027 Consumer Confidence Reports, and comply with the PFOA and PFOS MCLs from April 26, 2029. Two proposals published on May 20, 2026 are not final: one would let systems in states where EPA holds primacy extend PFOA and PFOS compliance to April 26, 2031; the other would rescind the PFHxS, PFNA, HFPO-DA MCLs and the Hazard Index while keeping PFOA and PFOS. The rule is also before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit (American Water Works Association v. EPA, argued 2026-09-18 before Judges Millett, Pillard and Wilkins; no decision). Regulation data retrieved September 19, 2026.

Does Pennsylvania have its own PFAS limits?

Yes. Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PA DEP), Bureau of Safe Drinking Water enforces MCLs under 25 Pa. Code Chapter 109 (PFAS MCL Rule): PFOA 14 ng/L (since January 14, 2023); PFOS 18 ng/L (since January 14, 2023). The federal PFOA and PFOS MCLs (4.0 ng/L) are stricter than every state MCL, so the federal line is about severity and the state line is about what is enforceable today. In this UCMR 5 sample, no compound was above a Pennsylvania MCL. State monitoring: initial monitoring 2024, quarterly compliance monitoring since 2024; statewide results summary xlsx refreshed semi-annually.

Is this the water that comes out of my tap in Nwwa Warrington Township?

Only if Nwwa Warrington Township (PWSID PA1090070) is your water system: check your water bill or your ZIP code page on this site, or the Bucks County page. Samples are taken at the entry point to the distribution system, not at your tap. The system may have changed sources or installed treatment since this sample. PFAS treatment reported to EPA: granular activated carbon (GAC), no PFAS treatment reported (NMT). The system's own Consumer Confidence Report, published every year, states what it measures today.

What can I do about PFAS in my water?

Ask Nwwa Warrington Township for its latest PFAS results and its plan for the 2029 MCLs, read its Consumer Confidence Report (EPA's CCR finder, PWSID PA1090070), and if you want to lower PFAS at home, use a filter certified to NSF/ANSI 53 or 58 for PFOA and PFOS (reverse osmosis and activated carbon block filters; see the filter comparison linked on this page). Boiling water does not remove PFAS.

Are PFAS levels rising in Nwwa Warrington Township's water?

No PFAS-4 compound was quantified in any of the 40 UCMR 5 sampling events since January 15, 2025; each result was below the 3 to 4 ng/L reporting limit.

Where does this data come from?

Source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule (UCMR 5), final dataset August 2026, retrieved 2026-09-19. Public domain. Results are entry-point samples and do not indicate compliance with drinking water standards. System registry from EPA SDWIS/ECHO (2026Q2 edition); service areas from EPA ORD (model code MIT); geography from the U.S. Census Bureau. pfasnearme retrieved the data on September 19, 2026.

Water systems in the same county

Other community water systems in Bucks County covered by this site, largest first.

Nearby water systems

The community water systems closest to Nwwa Warrington Township covered by this site, by service-area center.

Data source

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule (UCMR 5) occurrence data, final dataset (August 2026)
https://www.epa.gov/dwucmr/occurrence-data-unregulated-contaminant-monitoring-rule
License
Public domain (U.S. federal government work, 17 U.S.C. § 105)
Retrieved
September 19, 2026
Entry points and samples
Entry Point 101 (WELLS 1,2,6 EP), Entry Point 102 (WELL 3 EP), Entry Point 104 (WELL 5 EP), Entry Point 105 (WELL 8 EP), Entry Point 106 (WELL 9 EP), Entry Point 107 (WELL 11 EP), Entry Point 108 (NWWA STUMP RD), Entry Point 109 (NWWA PICKERTOWN RD), Entry Point 110 (NWWA BRADFORD GREENE), Entry Point 111 (NWWA LOWER NIKE), Entry Point 112 (NWWA WOODLANDS), Entry Point 113 (NWWA HIGH GROVE), Entry Point 114 (NWWA COUNTY LINE RD)
UCMR 5 sample window
January 15, 2025 to October 22, 2025; 13 entry points, 46 sampling events
Source water
groundwater, surface water; community water system (large, over 10,000 people)
PFAS treatment reported to EPA
granular activated carbon (GAC), no PFAS treatment reported (NMT). The system may have changed sources or installed treatment since this sample.
Consumer Confidence Report
Search EPA's CCR finder for PWSID PA1090070 to read the system's own annual report
Regulation data (MCLs, dates) retrieved
September 19, 2026

Source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule (UCMR 5), final dataset August 2026, retrieved 2026-09-19. Public domain. Results are entry-point samples and do not indicate compliance with drinking water standards.

System registry from EPA SDWIS/ECHO (2026Q2 edition); service areas from EPA ORD (model code MIT); geography from the U.S. Census Bureau.

UCMR 5 results do not indicate compliance or noncompliance with the PFAS drinking water standards. Samples are taken at the entry point to the distribution system, not at the tap; the system may have changed sources or installed treatment since. Treatment reported to EPA for PFAS: granular activated carbon (GAC), no PFAS treatment (NMT). 13 entry points sampled, 46 sampling events between 2025-01-15 and 2025-11-20. The page's PFAS values come from the newest sample at Entry Point 111 (NWWA LOWER NIKE) (111/E), the entry point with the highest PFOA + PFOS + PFNA + PFHxS sum; the other entry points' maxima are listed as separate rows. Non-detects are shown as "<" followed by EPA's minimum reporting level (3 to 20 ng/L); PFAS-4 sums quantified compounds only, so it is a lower bound when a compound was not detected. Registry (name, population, counties, ZIPs) from EPA SDWIS/ECHO; service-area centroid from EPA ORD.

This site is a data project, not an official source. If in doubt, check with your water supplier or local authority.