PFAS in tap water, Worcester County, Massachusetts

15 of 43 water systems had PFAS-4 above our 0.5 ng/L benchmark at the latest sample. Highest: Milford Water Department, 13.7 ng/L. 18 had PFOA or PFOS above the 4 ng/L federal MCL in at least one sample.

43 community water systems · 700,043 people served · newest sample December 3, 2025

Water systems in Worcester County

Water system People served PFAS-4 at the latest sample Entry points Latest sample
Worcester Dpwp, Water Supply Division 206,518 below the 3 to 4 ng/L reporting limit 1 April 17, 2024
Fitchburg DPW Division of Water Supply 41,946 below the 3 to 4 ng/L reporting limit above the 2029 federal MCL in an earlier sample 2 December 4, 2024
Leominster Water Division 41,683 4.3 ng/L above the 2029 federal MCL 4 January 8, 2025
Shrewsbury Water Department 38,325 11 ng/L above the 2029 federal MCL 1 May 9, 2024
Milford Water Department 30,379 13.7 ng/L above the 2029 federal MCL 2 June 30, 2025
Westborough Water Department 21,567 below the 3 to 4 ng/L reporting limit above the 2029 federal MCL in an earlier sample 5 February 15, 2024
Gardner Water Department 21,381 below the 3 to 4 ng/L reporting limit 2 December 5, 2023
Southbridge Water Department 19,562 below the 3 to 4 ng/L reporting limit 1 November 14, 2023
Holden Water Division, DPW 18,016 4.9 ng/L above the 2029 federal MCL 4 January 30, 2024
Webster Water Department 17,776 4.4 ng/L above the 2029 federal MCL 2 November 29, 2023
Clinton Water Dept 15,428 below the 3 to 4 ng/L reporting limit 1 November 5, 2024
Northborough Water Department (MWRA) 13,551 below the 3 to 4 ng/L reporting limit 1 October 18, 2023
Auburn Water District 12,255 4.1 ng/L above the 2029 federal MCL 6 September 10, 2025
Uxbridge DPW, Water Division 11,612 10.1 ng/L above the 2029 federal MCL 3 February 3, 2025
Ash/Win Joint Water Authority 11,394 below the 3 to 4 ng/L reporting limit 1 October 15, 2025
Aquarion Water Company, Millbury 11,368 below the 3 to 4 ng/L reporting limit above the 2029 federal MCL in an earlier sample 3 December 13, 2023
Grafton Water District 10,925 11.9 ng/L above the 2029 federal MCL 4 August 20, 2025
Southborough DPW Water Division (MWRA) 10,638 below the 3 to 4 ng/L reporting limit 1 October 17, 2023
Athol DPW Water Division 10,587 below the 3 to 4 ng/L reporting limit 2 March 26, 2025
Blackstone Water Department 9,463 5.7 ng/L above the 2029 federal MCL 1 October 7, 2025
Northbridge Water Division 8,127 below the 3 to 4 ng/L reporting limit 1 October 8, 2024
Whitinsville Water Company 7,899 below the 3 to 4 ng/L reporting limit 2 October 3, 2023
Aquarion Water Company Oxford 7,384 below the 3 to 4 ng/L reporting limit 3 January 8, 2025
Lunenburg Water District 7,219 below the 3 to 4 ng/L reporting limit above the 2029 federal MCL in an earlier sample 2 December 6, 2023
Spencer Water Department 7,037 below the 3 to 4 ng/L reporting limit 2 August 27, 2024
West Boylston Water District 6,919 5.4 ng/L above the 2029 federal MCL 4 December 4, 2024
Sterling Water Department 6,715 5.2 ng/L above the 2029 federal MCL 2 August 14, 2024
Templeton Munic. Light and Water Plant 6,159 5.1 ng/L above the 2029 federal MCL 4 October 1, 2024
Rutland Water Department 6,025 below the 3 to 4 ng/L reporting limit 2 April 8, 2024
Hopedale Water Department 6,017 11.1 ng/L above the 2029 federal MCL 1 October 6, 2025
Lancaster Water Department 6,000 below the 3 to 4 ng/L reporting limit 2 September 8, 2025
Winchendon Water Department 5,706 below the 3 to 4 ng/L reporting limit 1 October 3, 2023
Dudley Water Department 5,515 below the 3 to 4 ng/L reporting limit 1 July 12, 2023
Sturbridge Water Department 4,746 below the 3 to 4 ng/L reporting limit 2 December 4, 2024
Upton DPW Water/Wastewater Division 4,420 below the 3 to 4 ng/L reporting limit 3 December 6, 2023
Douglas Water Department 4,400 4 ng/L 2 December 1, 2025
Paxton Water Department 4,300 below the 3 to 4 ng/L reporting limit 1 December 20, 2023
Westminster Department of Public Works 3,889 below the 3 to 4 ng/L reporting limit 1 November 5, 2024
North Brookfield Water Department 3,863 below the 3 to 4 ng/L reporting limit 1 November 5, 2024
Cherry Valley/ Rochdale Water District 3,696 below the 3 to 4 ng/L reporting limit 2 December 3, 2024
Ashburnham Water Department 3,680 below the 3 to 4 ng/L reporting limit 1 January 14, 2025
Boylston Water District 3,343 4 ng/L above the 2029 federal MCL 3 December 3, 2025
Barre Water Department 2,610 below the 3 to 4 ng/L reporting limit 3 January 17, 2024
Southbridge Tool and Manufacturing non-transient non-community water system 58 monitored under UCMR 5, no page

1 system without a page is not a community water system (schools, workplaces, campgrounds). Nobody's home tap water.

Not sure which one is yours? The systems report their own service areas to EPA. Check your water bill or your utility's Consumer Confidence Report.

Cities and towns

ZIP codes in Worcester County

Census ZIP code tabulation areas that overlap the county. A ZIP served by one system opens that system's page; a ZIP shared by several systems lists them.

How to read these numbers

We compare PFAS-4 (PFOA + PFOS + PFNA + PFHxS) with this site's 0.5 ng/L benchmark, the same line as on the European pages. UCMR 5 reporting limits are 3 to 4 ng/L. So any quantified PFAS-4 compound is above the benchmark, and a clean result reads "below the 3 to 4 ng/L reporting limit", never zero. The US legal limit is the 4 ng/L federal MCL for PFOA and PFOS, which systems must meet from April 26, 2029 ("above the 2029 federal MCL").

EPA: "UCMR 5 results do not indicate compliance or noncompliance with the PFAS drinking water standards". Samples are taken where water enters the distribution system, not at your tap. A system may have changed sources or added treatment since. Source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Office of Water, PFAS National Primary Drinking Water Regulation (NPDWR). Regulation details retrieved September 19, 2026. Every system page tracks the 2029 compliance date and the proposed rescission of the PFHxS, PFNA, HFPO-DA and Hazard Index limits.

This site is a data project, not an official source. If in doubt, check with your water supplier or local authority.