PFAS in the drinking water of Binghamton, City of: 9.5 ng/L, 19x our 0.5 ng/L benchmark

Last PFAS check: · Source: EPA UCMR 5

PFAS in drinking water

19× above our health benchmark

Amount found in the water 9.5 ng/L 0.0095 µg/L · the 4 most harmful PFAS (PFAS-4)
Our health benchmark 0.5 ng/L

0.5 ng/L is our benchmark, not an official limit. It uses the same EFSA method as the Swedish, Danish and Dutch limits, with stricter safety choices. It's meant as a yearly average. The comparison above uses the latest check.

checked on November 29, 2023

Sampled on November 29, 2023 at Well Sample Tap (Olmstead Well TP). It has the highest PFAS-4 sum of the system's 2 entry points. Samples are taken at the entry point to the distribution system, not at your tap.

More about this result

Substances below the detection limit count as 0, so the real total may be higher.

One of these four, PFOA, is classified as causing cancer in humans by the WHO's cancer research agency (IARC).

More PFAS than in 86% of the water systems we track

UCMR 5 measures 29 PFAS one by one and publishes no EU-style total; this page shows the PFAS-4 sum and each compound.

29 PFAS (see each substance)
PFAS substance Value
PFOS 5.5 ng/L
PFOA 4 ng/L
PFPeA 3.9 ng/L
PFHxA 3.3 ng/L
PFBS 3.1 ng/L
PFHxS below the 3 ng/L reporting limit
PFNA below the 4 ng/L reporting limit
HFPO-DA below the 5 ng/L reporting limit
11Cl-PF3OUdS below the 5 ng/L reporting limit
4:2 FTS below the 3 ng/L reporting limit
6:2 FTS below the 5 ng/L reporting limit
8:2 FTS below the 5 ng/L reporting limit
9Cl-PF3ONS below the 2 ng/L reporting limit
ADONA below the 3 ng/L reporting limit
NEtFOSAA below the 5 ng/L reporting limit
NFDHA below the 20 ng/L reporting limit
NMeFOSAA below the 6 ng/L reporting limit
PFBA below the 5 ng/L reporting limit
PFDA below the 3 ng/L reporting limit
PFDoA below the 3 ng/L reporting limit
PFEESA below the 3 ng/L reporting limit
PFHpA below the 3 ng/L reporting limit
PFHpS below the 3 ng/L reporting limit
PFMBA below the 3 ng/L reporting limit
PFMPA below the 4 ng/L reporting limit
PFPeS below the 4 ng/L reporting limit
PFTA below the 8 ng/L reporting limit
PFTrDA below the 7 ng/L reporting limit
PFUnA below the 2 ng/L reporting limit

Above our health benchmark. You can compare filter types below.

Federal MCL, PFOA and PFOS (each)
4.0 ng/L PFOS above it at the headline sample; applies from April 2029
Latest UCMR 5 sample
November 29, 2023 entry-point sample, not your tap
EPA system ID (PWSID)
NY0301651
Details and sources

At Binghamton, City of (New York), the four most closely watched PFAS (PFAS-4) add up to at least 9.5 ng/L (0.0095 µg/L), the other compounds being below the 3 to 4 ng/L reporting limit in the latest UCMR 5 entry-point sample on November 29, 2023 at Well Sample Tap (Olmstead Well TP). That is 19 times the 0.5 ng/L health benchmark used by pfasnearme. PFOA 4 ng/L and PFOS 5.5 ng/L, PFOS above the 4.0 ng/L federal MCL for PFOA and PFOS that systems must meet from April 2029. Across 6 UCMR 5 sampling events since May 4, 2023, the PFAS-4 sum reached up to 9.5 ng/L and was below the reporting limits at other times. Source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule (UCMR 5) occurrence data, final dataset (August 2026), public domain.

EPA system ID (PWSID): NY0301651Population served: 47,600 Latest UCMR 5 sample: February 14, 2024 Data updated on

PFAS over time in Binghamton, City of

6 UCMR 5 sampling events since May 4, 2023, as published by EPA. Samples come from 2 entry points; the trend refers to Well Sample Tap (Olmstead Well TP).

0.5 ng/L9.5 ng/L0May 4, 2023February 14, 2024
PFAS-4 sum per sampling event in ng/L. Dashed line: pfasnearme's 0.5 ng/L benchmark. Hollow dots: no compound quantified.
DatePFAS-4Entry point
< 15 ng/LLaboratory Sink (Water Filtration Plant)
< 15 ng/LLaboratory Sink (Water Filtration Plant)
9.5 ng/LWell Sample Tap (Olmstead Well TP)
< 15 ng/LLaboratory Sink (Water Filtration Plant)
< 15 ng/LLaboratory Sink (Water Filtration Plant)
5 ng/LWell Sample Tap (Olmstead Well TP)

A value preceded by "<" means no PFAS-4 compound was quantified, the figure being the sum of the four UCMR 5 reporting limits. Sums with a compound below the 3 to 4 ng/L reporting limit are lower bounds. How to read a PFAS result

Compliance status

UCMR 5 results do not indicate compliance or noncompliance with the PFAS drinking water standards. UCMR 5 is a national monitoring survey; the system's compliance record and its annual Consumer Confidence Report come from the state agency and EPA's SDWIS.

See all 3 test results
What was tested Value Limit Status
PFAS Hazard Index (US EPA) 0 (index) MCL (from April 2029): 1 within the Hazard Index limit
PFAS-4 (PFOA + PFOS + PFNA + PFHxS) · Laboratory Sink (Water Filtration Plant) · maximum below the 15 ng/L reporting limit no MCL for the sum; MCL (from April 2029) 4.0 ng/L for PFOA and for PFOS not detected
Lithium · UCMR 5, for reference below the 9 µg/L reporting limit no MCL for reference

Frequently asked questions

Is the tap water in Binghamton, City of safe to drink?

In the latest UCMR 5 entry-point sample on November 29, 2023, the four most closely watched PFAS added up to at least 9.5 ng/L, 19 times the 0.5 ng/L health benchmark pfasnearme uses. PFOS was above the 4.0 ng/L federal MCL that systems must meet from April 2029. EPA set the maximum contaminant level goal (MCLG) for PFOA and PFOS at zero because there is no level without risk. UCMR 5 results do not indicate compliance or noncompliance with the PFAS drinking water standards, and this site reports published measurements without judging health risk. This is not medical advice. If you are concerned, talk to your water system or your doctor.

What is UCMR 5 and why do the results say "below the reporting limit"?

The Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule (UCMR 5) had every large US water system and a sample of small ones test 29 PFAS and lithium between 2023 and 2025, at each entry point to the distribution system. EPA set minimum reporting levels of 3 to 4 ng/L for PFOA, PFOS, PFNA and PFHxS and reports nothing below them. A result "below the 3 to 4 ng/L reporting limit" therefore means the lab could not quantify the compound, not that it is absent, and it is never shown here as zero.

What do the 0.5 ng/L benchmark and the 4.0 ng/L MCL mean, and why are both shown?

0.5 ng/L for the PFAS-4 sum (PFOA + PFOS + PFNA + PFHxS) is the health benchmark pfasnearme applies on every page, in Europe and the United States, built from the European Food Safety Authority's tolerable intake with stricter safety choices. 4.0 ng/L is the enforceable federal maximum contaminant level for PFOA and for PFOS individually under EPA's PFAS National Primary Drinking Water Regulation (NPDWR), the US legal limit. Any PFAS-4 compound quantified under UCMR 5 (at or above 3 to 4 ng/L) is above the benchmark, so the benchmark tells you whether anything was found and the MCL tells you whether the system would have to act. EPA set the maximum contaminant level goal (MCLG) for PFOA and PFOS at zero because there is no level without risk.

When does the 4.0 ng/L MCL apply, and could it change?

EPA published the PFAS National Primary Drinking Water Regulation (NPDWR) on April 26, 2024. Systems must finish initial monitoring by April 26, 2027, tell customers about PFAS in their 2027 Consumer Confidence Reports, and comply with the PFOA and PFOS MCLs from April 26, 2029. Two proposals published on May 20, 2026 are not final: one would let systems in states where EPA holds primacy extend PFOA and PFOS compliance to April 26, 2031; the other would rescind the PFHxS, PFNA, HFPO-DA MCLs and the Hazard Index while keeping PFOA and PFOS. The rule is also before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit (American Water Works Association v. EPA, argued 2026-09-18 before Judges Millett, Pillard and Wilkins; no decision). Regulation data retrieved September 19, 2026.

Does New York have its own PFAS limits?

Yes. New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH), Bureau of Water Supply Protection enforces MCLs under 10 NYCRR Subpart 5-1: PFOA 10 ng/L (since August 26, 2020); PFOS 10 ng/L (since August 26, 2020). The federal PFOA and PFOS MCLs (4.0 ng/L) are stricter than every state MCL, so the federal line is about severity and the state line is about what is enforceable today. In this UCMR 5 sample, no compound was above a New York MCL. State monitoring: quarterly compliance monitoring since 2020; annual mean and maximum per system published by the Environmental Public Health Tracker.

Is this the water that comes out of my tap in Binghamton, City of?

Only if Binghamton, City of (PWSID NY0301651) is your water system: check your water bill or your ZIP code page on this site, or the Broome County page. Samples are taken at the entry point to the distribution system, not at your tap. The system may have changed sources or installed treatment since this sample. PFAS treatment reported to EPA: no PFAS treatment reported (NMT). The system's own Consumer Confidence Report, published every year, states what it measures today.

What can I do about PFAS in my water?

Ask Binghamton, City of for its latest PFAS results and its plan for the 2029 MCLs, read its Consumer Confidence Report (EPA's CCR finder, PWSID NY0301651), and if you want to lower PFAS at home, use a filter certified to NSF/ANSI 53 or 58 for PFOA and PFOS (reverse osmosis and activated carbon block filters; see the filter comparison linked on this page). Boiling water does not remove PFAS.

Are PFAS levels rising in Binghamton, City of's water?

pfasnearme reads a trend per entry point, and the headline entry point (Well Sample Tap (Olmstead Well TP)) has 2 quantified samples across the 6 UCMR 5 sampling events since May 4, 2023; a trend needs at least three. UCMR 5 monitoring is complete, so later trends will come from state compliance monitoring.

Where does this data come from?

Source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule (UCMR 5), final dataset August 2026, retrieved 2026-09-19. Public domain. Results are entry-point samples and do not indicate compliance with drinking water standards. System registry from EPA SDWIS/ECHO (2026Q2 edition); service areas from EPA ORD (model code MIT); geography from the U.S. Census Bureau. pfasnearme retrieved the data on September 19, 2026.

Water systems in the same county

Other community water systems in Broome County covered by this site, largest first.

Nearby water systems

The community water systems closest to Binghamton, City of covered by this site, by service-area center.

Data source

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule (UCMR 5) occurrence data, final dataset (August 2026)
https://www.epa.gov/dwucmr/occurrence-data-unregulated-contaminant-monitoring-rule
License
Public domain (U.S. federal government work, 17 U.S.C. § 105)
Retrieved
September 19, 2026
Entry points and samples
Laboratory Sink (Water Filtration Plant), Well Sample Tap (Olmstead Well TP)
UCMR 5 sample window
May 4, 2023 to February 14, 2024; 2 entry points, 6 sampling events
Source water
groundwater, surface water; community water system (large, over 10,000 people)
PFAS treatment reported to EPA
no PFAS treatment reported (NMT). The system may have changed sources or installed treatment since this sample.
Consumer Confidence Report
Search EPA's CCR finder for PWSID NY0301651 to read the system's own annual report
Regulation data (MCLs, dates) retrieved
September 19, 2026

Source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule (UCMR 5), final dataset August 2026, retrieved 2026-09-19. Public domain. Results are entry-point samples and do not indicate compliance with drinking water standards.

System registry from EPA SDWIS/ECHO (2026Q2 edition); service areas from EPA ORD (model code MIT); geography from the U.S. Census Bureau.

UCMR 5 results do not indicate compliance or noncompliance with the PFAS drinking water standards. Samples are taken at the entry point to the distribution system, not at the tap; the system may have changed sources or installed treatment since. Treatment reported to EPA for PFAS: no PFAS treatment (NMT). 2 entry points sampled, 6 sampling events between 2023-05-04 and 2024-02-14. The page's PFAS values come from the newest sample at Well Sample Tap (Olmstead Well TP) (90002/WELL001), the entry point with the highest PFOA + PFOS + PFNA + PFHxS sum; the other entry points' maxima are listed as separate rows. Non-detects are shown as "<" followed by EPA's minimum reporting level (3 to 20 ng/L); PFAS-4 sums quantified compounds only, so it is a lower bound when a compound was not detected. Registry (name, population, counties, ZIPs) from EPA SDWIS/ECHO; service-area centroid from EPA ORD.

This site is a data project, not an official source. If in doubt, check with your water supplier or local authority.