PFAS in Viâpres-le-Petit's tap water: under 8 ng/L, none of the four main PFAS detected
Last PFAS check: · Source: Hub'eau
PFAS in drinking water
No PFAS detected
The lab sees nothing below 8 ng/L, 16 times our benchmark of 0.5 ng/L. Water above our benchmark would pass this check unnoticed.
0.5 ng/L is our benchmark, not an official limit. Same EFSA method as Sweden, Denmark and the Netherlands, but stricter. It's a yearly average, compared here with the latest check.
Sample taken in Champigny-sur-Aube, on the same distribution network as Viâpres-le-Petit (PLANCY RHEGES VIAPRES RESEAU). The health authority samples one tap per network; a network carries the same treated water everywhere.
More about this result
The US also limits PFOA and PFOS to 4 ng/L each, per substance.
The lab detects each of the four substances from 2 ng/L upward. None reached that limit, so their total is below 8 ng/L rather than zero.
checked on 15 April 2025
20 PFAS (see each substance)
| PFAS substance | Value |
|---|---|
| Acide perfluoro-nonanoïque (PFNA) | <0,002 µg/L |
| Acide sulfonique de perfluorobutane (PFBS) | <0,002 µg/L |
| Acide perfluoroheptane sulfonique (PFHpS) | <0,002 µg/L |
| Perfluorohexane sulfonate (PFHXS) | <0,002 µg/L |
| Acide perfluoro undecanoïque (PFUnA) | <0,002 µg/L |
| Acide perfluorodecane sulfonique (PFDS) | <0,002 µg/L |
| Acide perfluoro tridecanoique (PFTrDA) | <0,002 µg/L |
| Acide perfluorododécane sulfonique (PFDoDS) | <0,002 µg/L |
| Acide perfluorohexanoïque (PFHXA) | <0,005 µg/L |
| Acide perfluoropentane sulfonique (PFPS) | <0,002 µg/L |
| Acide sulfonique de perfluorooctane (PFOS) | <0,002 µg/L |
| Acide perfluorododécanoique (PFDoDA) | <0,002 µg/L |
| Acide perfluorobutanoïque (PFBA) | <0,005 µg/L |
| Acide perfluoropentanoïque (PFPEA) | <0,005 µg/L |
| Acide perfluoro-decanoïque (PFDA) | <0,002 µg/L |
| Acide perfluoro-octanoïque (PFOA) | <0,002 µg/L |
| Acide perfluoroheptanoïque (PFHPA) | <0,002 µg/L |
| Acide perfluoro tridecane sulfonique (PFTrDS) | <0,005 µg/L |
| Acide perfluoro undecane sulfonique (PFUnDS) | <0,002 µg/L |
| Acide perfluorononane sulfonique (PFNS) | <0,002 µg/L |
Fails a current legal limit. The details are below.
Water report for Viâpres-le-Petit
Get new PFAS results for Viâpres-le-Petit, with a short explanation. At most one update a week, only when there's something new.
- EU legal limit
- none detected sum of 20 PFAS below the detection limit, limit 100 ng/L
- Last PFAS test
- 15 April 2025
- Water supplier
- REGIE DU S.D.D.E.A.
In Viâpres-le-Petit, none of the 4 most closely watched PFAS (PFAS-4) was detected at the latest PFAS check on 15 April 2025. The total is below 8 ng/L, the sum of the detection limits and 16 times our 0.5 ng/L benchmark. Sum of 20 PFAS: <0,005 µg/L, below the EU legal limit (100 ng/L). Sampled in Champigny-sur-Aube, on the same network. Source: Hub'eau, Qualité de l'eau potable (Ministère de la Santé / OFB / BRGM).
Details and sources
PFAS over time in Viâpres-le-Petit
A single PFAS check has been published for Viâpres-le-Petit so far (15 April 2025). A history will build up with the next checks; this page is refreshed weekly.
What the latest check found
At the latest check, the water was over at least one limit.
See all 12 test results
| What was tested | Value | Limit | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nitrate | 20 mg/L | ≤ 50 mg/L | within the limit |
| Lead | <0,5 µg/L | ≤ 10 µg/L | within the limit |
| Copper | 0.0128 mg/L | ≤ 2 mg/L | within the limit |
| Nickel | 0.8 µg/L | ≤ 20 µg/L | within the limit |
| Cadmium | <0,5 µg/L | ≤ 5 µg/L | within the limit |
| Chromium | <0,5 µg/L | ≤ 50 µg/L | within the limit |
| Escherichia coli | <1 n/(100mL) | ≤ 0 mL) | within the limit |
| Enterococci | <1 n/(100mL) | ≤ 0 mL) | within the limit |
| Coliform bacteria | <1 n/(100mL) | ≤ 0 mL) | within the limit |
| pH | 7.7 unité pH | 6.5–9 unité pH | within the limit |
| Electrical conductivity | 410 µS/cm | 200–1,100 µS/cm | within the limit |
| Turbidity | <0,1 NFU | ≤ 2 NFU | within the limit |
Frequently asked questions
Is tap water in Viâpres-le-Petit safe to drink?
At the latest check, the water was over at least one limit. “Eau non conforme aux limites de qualité réglementaire fixées à 0,1 µg/L pour au moins un pesticide ou un métabolite de pesticide pertinent. Cependant, la valeur sanitaire propre à chaque molécule n'a pas été dépassée. L'eau peut donc être consommée par tous. Dans une telle situation, le responsable de la distribution d'eau doit : informer la population et engager un programme visant à améliorer la situation. Un contrôle renforcé a été prévu pour vérifier l'évolution de ce paramètre. Il est à noter une teneur en chlore libre trop élevée. La teneur en chlore libre sur le réseau de distribution doit être de l'ordre de 0,1 mg/l.”
How high are PFAS levels in Viâpres-le-Petit's drinking water?
At the latest check the total of 20 PFAS ("forever chemicals") was below the laboratory's reporting limit of 5 ng/L. The EU limit is 100 ng/L, so this water is under 5 % of the limit. (below the EU limit)
Does the water in Viâpres-le-Petit also meet the strictest limits in Europe?
The check cannot say. None of the four compounds was quantified, but the laboratory's detection limits add up to 8 ng/L, above Sweden's legal limit of 4 ng/L in force since 2026, so a value between the two would go unnoticed.
How hard is the water in Viâpres-le-Petit?
No hardness value is available for Viâpres-le-Petit in this source.
Where does this data come from?
All values come from official publications: Hub'eau, Qualité de l'eau potable (Ministère de la Santé / OFB / BRGM). Retrieved on 12 September 2026.
Same water network
Same distribution network as Viâpres-le-Petit, so in principle the same water.
Nearby communes
The closest to Viâpres-le-Petit on this site.
Data source
- Hub'eau, Qualité de l'eau potable (Ministère de la Santé / OFB / BRGM)
- https://hubeau.eaufrance.fr/api/v1/qualite_eau_potable/resultats_dis?code_commune=10408
- License
- Licence Ouverte / Open Licence (Etalab)
- Retrieved
- 12 September 2026
- Supply networks
- PLANCY RHEGES VIAPRES RESEAU
This site is a data project, not an official source. If in doubt, check with your water supplier or local authority.