PFAS in Dole's tap water: 61 ng/L, 122x our 0.5 ng/L benchmark

Last PFAS check: · Source: Hub'eau

Fails the current legal limits

PFAS in drinking water

122× above our health benchmark

Amount found in the water 61 ng/L 0.061 µg/L · the 4 most harmful PFAS (PFAS-4)
Our health benchmark 0.5 ng/L

0.5 ng/L is our benchmark, not an official limit. Same EFSA method as Sweden, Denmark and the Netherlands, but stricter. It's a yearly average, compared here with the latest check.

More about this result

The US also limits PFOA and PFOS to 4 ng/L each, per substance.

Substances below the detection limit count as 0, so the real total may be higher.

One of these four, PFOA, is classified as causing cancer in humans by the WHO's cancer research agency (IARC).

More PFAS than in 100% of the cities we track

20 PFAS (see each substance)
PFAS substance Value
Acide sulfonique de perfluorooctane (PFOS) 0.041 µg/L
Perfluorohexane sulfonate (PFHXS) 0.016 µg/L
Acide perfluoropentanoïque (PFPEA) 0.015 µg/L
Acide perfluorohexanoïque (PFHXA) 0.011 µg/L
Acide perfluorobutanoïque (PFBA) 0.007 µg/L
Acide perfluoroheptanoïque (PFHPA) 0.005 µg/L
Acide perfluoro-octanoïque (PFOA) 0.004 µg/L
Acide perfluoropentane sulfonique (PFPS) 0.002 µg/L
Acide sulfonique de perfluorobutane (PFBS) 0.002 µg/L
Acide perfluoro-decanoïque (PFDA) <0,001 µg/L
Acide perfluorononane sulfonique (PFNS) <0,002 µg/L
Acide perfluorodecane sulfonique (PFDS) <0,001 µg/L
Acide perfluoro undecanoïque (PFUnA) <0,001 µg/L
Acide perfluoro tridecane sulfonique (PFTrDS) <0,005 µg/L
Acide perfluoro undecane sulfonique (PFUnDS) <0,002 µg/L
Acide perfluoro-nonanoïque (PFNA) <0,001 µg/L
Acide perfluoro tridecanoique (PFTrDA) <0,001 µg/L
Acide perfluorododécanoique (PFDoDA) <0,001 µg/L
Acide perfluoroheptane sulfonique (PFHpS) <0,002 µg/L
Acide perfluorododécane sulfonique (PFDoDS) <0,001 µg/L

Fails a current legal limit. Here are some filter options.

EU legal limit
103 ng/L sum of 20 PFAS, above the 100 ng/L limit
Last PFAS test
21 July 2026
Water supplier
DOLEA EAU

In Dole, the 4 most closely watched PFAS (PFAS-4) add up to 61 ng/L (0.061 µg/L) at the latest PFAS check on 21 July 2026. That's 122 times our 0.5 ng/L health benchmark, and above Sweden's legal limit of 4 ng/L. Sum of 20 PFAS: 103 ng/L (0.103 µg/L), above the EU legal limit (100 ng/L). 18 checks since 19 August 2025: PFAS-4 from 6 ng/L to 70 ng/L, averaging 52.86 ng/L over 12 months. No clear trend. Source: Hub'eau, Qualité de l'eau potable (Ministère de la Santé / OFB / BRGM).

Details and sources
Water supplier: DOLEA EAU Latest water check: 28 July 2026 Data updated on

PFAS over time in Dole

28 PFAS checks since 18 June 2024, from the published measurements. Samples from 6 communes on the same network: it's the same water, so each one applies to Dole. Samples come from 3 distribution networks. The trend refers to the network “SIEA DE LA REGION DE DOLE SUD”.

“Calculated”: PFAS-4 worked out from the four substances in the same sample. The chart, averages and trends use lab-published sums only.

0.5 ng/L70 ng/L019 August 202521 July 2026
PFAS-4 sum per check in ng/L. Dashed line: pfasnearme's 0.5 ng/L benchmark. Hollow dots: below the detection limit.
DatePFAS-4Sum of 20 PFASSampled atNetwork
61 ng/L103 ng/LDoleSIEA DE LA REGION DE DOLE SUD
58 ng/L99 ng/LCrisseySIEA DE LA REGION DE DOLE SUD
41 ng/L76 ng/LDoleDOLE GUENIERES
39 ng/L43 ng/LDoleDOLE LANDON & PLUMONT
45 ng/L78 ng/LChoiseySIEA DE LA REGION DE DOLE SUD
43 ng/L75 ng/LParceySIEA DE LA REGION DE DOLE SUD
45 ng/L82 ng/LFoucheransSIEA DE LA REGION DE DOLE SUD
45 ng/L94 ng/LVillette-lès-DoleSIEA DE LA REGION DE DOLE SUD
6 ng/L6 ng/LVillette-lès-DoleSIEA DE LA REGION DE DOLE SUD
62 ng/L110 ng/LVillette-lès-DoleSIEA DE LA REGION DE DOLE SUD
56 ng/L62 ng/LDoleDOLE GUENIERES
70 ng/L135 ng/LDoleSIEA DE LA REGION DE DOLE SUD
Show the 16 earlier checks (back to 18 June 2024)
70 ng/L134 ng/LDoleSIEA DE LA REGION DE DOLE SUD
57 ng/L106 ng/LDoleSIEA DE LA REGION DE DOLE SUD
62 ng/L115 ng/LDoleSIEA DE LA REGION DE DOLE SUD
54 ng/L104 ng/LDoleSIEA DE LA REGION DE DOLE SUD
62 ng/L113 ng/LDoleSIEA DE LA REGION DE DOLE SUD
66 ng/L71 ng/LDoleDOLE LANDON & PLUMONT
67 ng/L – < 68 ng/L · calculated116 ng/LDoleSIEA DE LA REGION DE DOLE SUD
58 ng/L – < 59 ng/L · calculated94 ng/LDoleSIEA DE LA REGION DE DOLE SUD
58 ng/L – < 59 ng/L · calculated94 ng/LDoleSIEA DE LA REGION DE DOLE SUD
54 ng/L – < 55 ng/L · calculated95 ng/LDoleSIEA DE LA REGION DE DOLE SUD
74 ng/L · calculated129 ng/LDoleSIEA DE LA REGION DE DOLE SUD
42 ng/L – < 43 ng/L · calculated48 ng/LDoleDOLE LANDON & PLUMONT
44 ng/L – < 45 ng/L · calculated48 ng/LDoleDOLE GUENIERES
38 ng/L – < 39 ng/L · calculated43 ng/LDoleDOLE GUENIERES
33 ng/L – < 34 ng/L · calculated41 ng/LDoleDOLE LANDON & PLUMONT
59.3 ng/L – < 60.3 ng/L · calculated64.3 ng/LDoleDOLE LANDON & PLUMONT

Calculated values: “<” is an upper bound from published thresholds, “≥” a lower bound, “–” means no published sum or complete measurement. How to read a PFAS result

What the latest check found

At the latest check, the water was within every limit tested.

Microbiology: within the limit Chemistry: within the limit
See all 21 test results
What was tested Value Limit Status
Nitrate 9.8 mg/L ≤ 50 mg/L within the limit
Nitrite 0 mg/L ≤ 0.5 mg/L within the limit
Lead <2 µg/L ≤ 10 µg/L within the limit
Copper 0.033 mg(Cu)/L ≤ 2 mg(Cu)/L within the limit
Nickel <5 µg/L ≤ 20 µg/L within the limit
Arsenic <2 µg/L ≤ 10 µg/L within the limit
Cadmium <1 µg/L ≤ 5 µg/L within the limit
Chromium N.M. µg/L ≤ 6 µg/L no verdict
Uranium <10 µg/L ≤ 30 µg/L within the limit
Fluoride 0.06 mg/L ≤ 1.5 mg/L within the limit
Escherichia coli <1 n/(100mL) ≤ 0 mL) within the limit
Enterococci <1 n/(100mL) ≤ 0 mL) within the limit
Coliform bacteria <1 n/(100mL) ≤ 0 mL) within the limit
pH 7.1 unité pH 6.5–9 unité pH within the limit
Water hardness 28 °f no limit for reference
Electrical conductivity 550 µS/cm 200–1,100 µS/cm within the limit
Chloride 9.4 mg/L ≤ 250 mg/L within the limit
Sulphate 11 mg/L ≤ 250 mg/L within the limit
Sodium 6.3 mg/L ≤ 200 mg/L within the limit
Iron <10 µg/L ≤ 200 µg/L within the limit
Turbidity 0.24 NFU ≤ 2 NFU within the limit

Frequently asked questions

Is tap water in Dole safe to drink?

At the latest check, the water was over at least one limit. “Eau d'alimentation conforme aux limites de qualité. Référence de qualité non satisfaisante pour le paramètre suivant : tem pérature.”

How high are PFAS levels in Dole's drinking water?

The total of 20 PFAS ("forever chemicals") was last measured at 103 ng/L. The EU limit is 100 ng/L, so this water is at 103 % of the limit. (above the EU limit)

Does the water in Dole also meet the strictest limits in Europe?

No. The four most harmful PFAS add up to 61 ng/L. That is 15.3 times Sweden's legal limit of 4 ng/L, in force since 2026. Germany will set a similar one in 2028. The sum of 20 PFAS is 103 ng/L, above the EU legal limit of 100 ng/L.

Are PFAS levels rising in Dole's tap water?

No clear trend. Since 18 June 2024, 18 checks have been published; on the main network the PFAS-4 sum ranged between 6 ng/L and 70 ng/L (14 quantified values), at times below the detection limit. pfasnearme only reports a trend from a change of at least 25 % and 1 ng/L. These history statistics use laboratory-published sums only.

How hard is the water in Dole?

The water hardness in Dole is 28 °f (medium). This mainly matters for household appliances and detergent dosing, not for health.

Where does this data come from?

All values come from official publications: Hub'eau, Qualité de l'eau potable (Ministère de la Santé / OFB / BRGM). Retrieved on 21 September 2026.

Same water network

Same distribution network as Dole, so in principle the same water.

Nearby communes

The closest to Dole on this site.

Data source

Hub'eau, Qualité de l'eau potable (Ministère de la Santé / OFB / BRGM)
https://hubeau.eaufrance.fr/api/v1/qualite_eau_potable/resultats_dis?code_commune=39198
License
Licence Ouverte / Open Licence (Etalab)
Retrieved
21 September 2026
Supply networks
DOLE GUENIERES, DOLE LANDON & PLUMONT, SIEA DE LA REGION DE DOLE SUD

This site is a data project, not an official source. If in doubt, check with your water supplier or local authority.