PFAS in tap water, Bergen County, New Jersey
14 of 19 water systems had PFAS-4 above our 0.5 ng/L benchmark at the latest sample. Highest: Ho Ho Kus Water Dept, 65.6 ng/L. 18 had PFOA or PFOS above the 4 ng/L federal MCL in at least one sample.
19 community water systems · 1,142,274 people served · newest sample January 21, 2026
Water systems in Bergen County
| Water system | People served | PFAS-4 at the latest sample | Entry points | Latest sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Veolia Water New Jersey Hackensack | 792,713 | 20.2 ng/L above the 2029 federal MCL | 3 | February 12, 2025 |
| Ridgewood Water | 61,700 | 48.6 ng/L above the 2029 federal MCL | 17 | March 4, 2025 |
| Fair Lawn Water Dept | 35,564 | 7.8 ng/L above the 2029 federal MCL | 3 | June 9, 2025 |
| Garfield Water Department | 30,487 | 14.2 ng/L above the 2029 federal MCL | 4 | July 16, 2024 |
| Mahwah Water Department | 26,777 | 11.3 ng/L above the 2029 federal MCL | 5 | January 21, 2026 |
| Passaic Valley WC Lodi WD | 24,136 | 20.9 ng/L above the 2029 federal MCL | 1 | July 9, 2024 |
| Lyndhurst Water Department | 20,500 | 12.7 ng/L above the 2029 federal MCL | 1 | May 7, 2024 |
| Elmwood Park Water Dept | 20,374 | 7.5 ng/L above the 2029 federal MCL | 1 | January 24, 2024 |
| Hawthorne Water Department | 19,458 | below the 3 to 4 ng/L reporting limit | 4 | April 8, 2025 |
| Park Ridge Water Dept | 16,466 | 35.1 ng/L above the 2029 federal MCL | 13 | November 6, 2023 |
| Pvwc-North Arlington | 15,392 | 10.4 ng/L above the 2029 federal MCL | 1 | August 11, 2025 |
| Ramsey Water Dept | 15,207 | 13 ng/L above the 2029 federal MCL | 6 | January 13, 2025 |
| Saddle Brook Water Dept | 13,155 | below the 3 to 4 ng/L reporting limit above the 2029 federal MCL in an earlier sample | 1 | April 25, 2024 |
| Oakland Water Dept | 12,754 | below the 3 to 4 ng/L reporting limit above the 2029 federal MCL in an earlier sample | 4 | March 18, 2024 |
| Wallington Water Dept | 11,583 | 11.6 ng/L above the 2029 federal MCL | 1 | October 12, 2023 |
| Waldwick Water Dept | 10,208 | below the 3 to 4 ng/L reporting limit above the 2029 federal MCL in an earlier sample | 6 | January 12, 2026 |
| Veolia Water NJ Allendale Water System | 6,702 | below the 3 to 4 ng/L reporting limit above the 2029 federal MCL in an earlier sample | 4 | February 14, 2024 |
| Veolia Water New Jersey Franklin Lakes | 5,038 | 8.5 ng/L above the 2029 federal MCL | 2 | October 15, 2025 |
| Ho Ho Kus Water Dept | 4,060 | 65.6 ng/L above the 2029 federal MCL | 4 | October 11, 2023 |
Not sure which one is yours? The systems report their own service areas to EPA. Check your water bill or your utility's Consumer Confidence Report.
Cities and towns
- Allendale
- Alpine
- Bergenfield
- Bogota
- Carlstadt
- Cliffside Park
- Closter
- Cresskill
- Demarest
- Dumont
- East Rutherford
- Edgewater
- Elmwood Park
- Emerson
- Englewood
- Englewood Cliffs
- Fair Lawn
- Fairview
- Fort Lee
- Franklin Lakes
- Garfield
- Guttenberg
- Hackensack
- Harrington Park
- Hasbrouck Heights
- Haworth
- Hawthorne
- Hillsdale
- Hohokus Boro-0228
- Leonia
- Little Ferry
- Lodi
- Lyndhurst town/township
- Mahwah town/township
- Maywood
- Montvale
- Moonachie
- New Milford
- North Arlington
- North Bergen town/township
- Northvale
- Norwood
- Oakland
- Old Tappan
- Oradell
- Palisades Park
- Paramus
- Park Ridge
- Ramsey
- Ridgefield
- Ridgefield Park
- Ridgewood
- River Edge
- River Vale town/township
- Rochelle Park town/township
- Rockleigh
- Rutherford
- Saddle Brook town/township
- Saddle River
- Secaucus
- South Hackensack town/township
- Teaneck town/township
- Tenafly
- Teterboro
- Upper Saddle River
- Waldwick
- Wallington
- Washington
- Weehawken town/township
- West New York
- Westwood
- Wood-Ridge
- Woodcliff Lake
ZIP codes in Bergen County
Census ZIP code tabulation areas that overlap the county. A ZIP served by one system opens that system's page; a ZIP shared by several systems lists them.
- 07010
- 07020
- 07022
- 07024
- 07026
- 07031
- 07057
- 07070
- 07071
- 07072
- 07073
- 07074
- 07075
- 07401
- 07407
- 07410
- 07417
- 07423
- 07430
- 07432
- 07436
- 07446
- 07450
- 07452
- 07458
- 07463
- 07481
- 07603
- 07604
- 07605
- 07606
- 07607
- 07608
- 07620
- 07621
- 07624
- 07626
- 07627
- 07628
- 07630
- 07631
- 07632
- 07640
- 07641
- 07642
- 07643
- 07644
- 07645
- 07646
- 07647
- 07648
- 07649
- 07650
- 07652
- 07656
- 07657
- 07660
- 07661
- 07662
- 07663
- 07666
- 07670
- 07675
- 07677
How to read these numbers
We compare PFAS-4 (PFOA + PFOS + PFNA + PFHxS) with this site's 0.5 ng/L benchmark, the same line as on the European pages. UCMR 5 reporting limits are 3 to 4 ng/L. So any quantified PFAS-4 compound is above the benchmark, and a clean result reads "below the 3 to 4 ng/L reporting limit", never zero. The US legal limit is the 4 ng/L federal MCL for PFOA and PFOS, which systems must meet from April 26, 2029 ("above the 2029 federal MCL").
EPA: "UCMR 5 results do not indicate compliance or noncompliance with the PFAS drinking water standards". Samples are taken where water enters the distribution system, not at your tap. A system may have changed sources or added treatment since. Source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Office of Water, PFAS National Primary Drinking Water Regulation (NPDWR). Regulation details retrieved September 19, 2026. Every system page tracks the 2029 compliance date and the proposed rescission of the PFHxS, PFNA, HFPO-DA and Hazard Index limits.
This site is a data project, not an official source. If in doubt, check with your water supplier or local authority.